ETS TOFEL 評語
Reading Low(0-14)
Test takers who receive a score at the LOW level, as you did,
typically understand some of the information presented in
academic texts in English that require a wide range of reading
abilities, but their understanding is limited.
Test takers who receive a score at the LOW level typically
。have a command of basic academic vocabulary, but
their understanding of less common vocabulary is inconsistent;
。have limited ability to understand and connect
information, have difficulty recognizing paraphrases of
text information, and often rely on particular words and
phrases rather than a complete understanding of the text;
。have difficulty identifying the author's purpose, except when
that purpose is explicitly stated in the text or easy
to infer from the text; and
。can sometimes recognize major ideas from a text when
the information is clearly presented, memorable, or
illustrated by examples but have difficulty doing so when
the text is more demanding.
Listening High(22-30)
Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level, as you did,
typically understand conversations and lectures in English that
present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can
include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or
figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or
complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly
contradictory information.
When listening to lectures and conversations like these,
test takers at the HIGH level typically can
。understand main ideas and important details,
whether they are stated or implied;
。distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
。understand how information is being used (for example,
to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
。recognize how pieces of information are connected (for
example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
。understand many different ways that speakers use
language for purposes other than to give information (for
example, to emphasize a point, express agreement or
disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
。synthesize information, even when it is not presented in
sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
Speaking about familiar topics Fair(2.5 - 3.0)
Your responses indicate you are able to speak in English about
your personal experiences and opinions in a mostly clear and
coherent manner. Your speech is mostly clear with only
occasional errors. Grammar and vocabulary are somewhat
limited and include some errors. At times, the limitations prevent
you from elaborating fully on your ideas, but they do not
seriously interfere with overall communication.
Speaking about campus situations Fair(2.5 - 3.0)
Your responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about
reading material and experiences typically encountered by
university students. You are able to convey relevant information
about conversations, newspaper articles, and campus bulletins;
however, some details are missing or inaccurate. Limitations of
grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation at times cause difficulty
for the listener. However, they do not seriously interfere with
overall communication.
Speaking about academic course content Fair(2.5 - 3.0)
Your responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in
English about academic reading and lecture material, with only
minor communication problems. For the most part, your speech is
clear and easy to understand. However, some problems with
pronunciation and intonation may occasionally cause difficulty
for the listener. Your use of grammar and vocabulary is
adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are not fully
developed or are inaccurate.
Writing based on reading and listening Limited(1.0 - 2.0)
Your response was judged as limited due to
。failure to understand the lecture or reading passage;
deficiencies in relating the lecture to the reading passage; and/or
many grammatical errors and/or very unclear
expressions and sentence structures.
Writing based on knowledge and experience Fair(2.5 - 3.5)
You expressed ideas with reasons, examples, and details, but
your response indicated weaknesses such as
。you may not provide enough specific support and development
for your main points;
your ideas may be difficult to follow because of how you organize your
essay or because of the language you use to connect your ideas; and/or
grammatical mistakes or vague/incorrect uses of words may make
the writing difficult to understand.
Matlab 自訂顏色
3 年前
0 我想說....:
張貼留言